National Assembly Futures Institute

Congressional think tank designing
national future strategies

Future Research

(24-02 Series Report) A Meta-Evaluation Study on Mid- to Long-Term Plans in the Social Policy Sector
The government’s mid- to long-term plans, developed every 5–10 years, serve as critical legal frameworks to ensure policy consistency and long-term strategic direction. While these plans outline policy visions, they are non-binding and do not impose direct obligations or rights on citizens. However, their rapid growth in number—from 534 in 2019 to 679 in 2022— has exposed challenges such as weak interconnectivity and coherence among plans, redundancies, inefficiencies, and unclear hierarchies between upper- and lower-level plans. Additionally, frequent policy changes and vague funding strategies have further diminished the effectiveness of these plans. This study evaluates the structure and interconnectivity of mid- to long-term plans in the social policy sector, assessing their impact across key policy areas in a bid to propose actionable improvement strategies. This study employed network centrality and community detection analyses on 68 mid- to long-term plans across social policy areas, including healthcare, education, housing, employment, and social security. Key communities were identified around employment, healthcare, social security, population, and housing plans. High-centrality plans, such as the Basic Employment Policy Plan and the Comprehensive National Health Promotion Plan, were found to function as hubs within the network. However, the network as a whole exhibited low cohesion and significant fragmentation, underscoring the need for efficiency improvements. Meta-evaluations across major social policy areas provided the following critical insights: Regional Disparities and Depopulation: Region-specific policies and enhancements to living infrastructure are essential for addressing these issues. Health Inequalities: Expanding public healthcare institutions and leveraging digital healthcare solutions are critical for reducing disparities. Universal Policies for Vulnerable Groups: While universal policies for older adults and young children have shown some success in mitigating inequality, additional income-based support is required to address disparities within these groups. Work-Life Balance: Improving the universality and effectiveness of parental leave systems, alongside increasing male participation in parental leave, is crucial for achieving better work-life integration. To address the redundancies and fragmented linkages among mid- to long-term government plans, the establishment of a dedicated coordinating body is recommended. This body should ensure policy consistency by minimizing political interference. Furthermore, the National Assembly must strengthen the legal framework to improve the connectivity and systematic organization of these plans. Continuous monitoring of policy impacts and reinforcement of feedback mechanisms are essential for achieving sustained improvements. These institutional reforms are expected to enhance policy efficiency, reduce social inequality, and contribute to sustainable development. This study offers valuable insights to optimize mid- to long-term planning in the social policy sector.

2024.12.30

Future Research

(24-17 Research Report) 2024 National Future Perception and Values Survey - Basic Analysis Report
Despite its strong economic standing, Korea continues to face low levels of life satisfaction and happiness among its citizens, compounded by various social challenges. This highlights the need for a systematic approach to measuring quality of life and understanding public perceptions of societal changes to inform effective policy solutions. This study aimed to evaluate overall life satisfaction and future expectations among Koreans aged 15 and older through in-person household surveys conducted in 2024. Additionally, it analyzed perceptions of major societal changes, including demographic shifts, technological advancements, and environmental issues, to generate actionable policy insights. The study revealed an average life satisfaction score of 6.81 out of 10, with a relatively optimistic future expectation score of 7.02 for life five years from now. Higher satisfaction levels were observed among individuals with higher education, higher income, and those who were married. While respondents expressed high satisfaction with health, interpersonal relationships, and a sense of safety, their satisfaction with future stability was notably lower. Positive perceptions were also evident in areas such as life meaning, sense of achievement, and freedom in life decisions. In terms of social values, respondents strongly endorsed the importance of striving for better outcomes and demonstrated high trust in technological advancements. However, there was widespread concern about the negative impact that low birth rates and population aging will have on quality of life. A significant sense of responsibility for addressing climate change was also noted. Leisure activity preferences showed a strong inclination toward watching video content, with individuals tending to spend weekdays alone and weekends with family. The average length of residence was 35 years at the metropolitan level and 22.8 years at the provincial level, with moderate intent to remain in the respondents’ current residential areas. Targeted policies and in-depth research are essential for supporting vulnerable groups― such as the elderly, individuals with lower education levels, and low-income populations― who reported lower life satisfaction. Enhancing quality of life should be prioritized through shifts in social values and public perceptions. Systematic policy responses to demographic and technological changes are equally important, as are initiatives to increase awareness and encourage actionable responses to climate change. A comprehensive approach is necessary to continuously collect and analyze the data necessary for monitoring citizens' quality of life and perceptions of societal changes. These insights should be integrated into policy planning and decision-making to ensure relevance and effectiveness. This study provides a critical foundation for improving the quality of life for citizens and proactively addressing future societal challenges.

2024.12.30

News Release

Hosts the 2nd National Youth Future Forum: Envisioning the Future of Korea Led by Youth
National Assembly Futures Institute Youth Future Committee Hosts the 2nd National Youth Future Forum: Envisioning the Future of Korea Led by Youth Exploring the Reality of Youth Politics Through the Eyes of Young People and Seeking Paths Forward The Youth Future Committee of the National Assembly Futures Institute hosted the 2nd National Assembly Youth Future Forum under the theme “Envisioning the Future of Korea Led by Youth” on November 22 at 2:00 p.m. at the National Assembly Constitution Memorial Hall’s Experience Center. The forum sought to highlight the challenges of meaningful youth participation in politics amid growing societal interest in youth politics. Bringing together political experts, young politicians, and practitioners involved in youth political engagement, the National Assembly Youth Future Forum was designed to discuss the challenges faced by youth politics and explore potential paths forward. The opening ceremony began with congratulatory remarks from Jin Jong Oh, Youth Representative on the Supreme Council of the People Power Party, and Mo Kyung Jong, Member of the National Assembly from the Democratic Party of Korea (Chair of the National Youth Committee). In the first part of the seminar, Professor Jeong Hoi Ok from the Department of Political Science and Diplomacy at Myongji University delivered a keynote presentation titled “The Value of Youth Political Participation.” This was followed by a presentation by Kim Yoon Jo, a member of the Youth Future Committee at the National Assembly Futures Institute, on the topic “The Current State of Youth Political Participation.” In the second part of the forum, Professor Kang Won Taek from the Department of Political Science and International Relations at Seoul National University served as the moderator. The panelists were Park Ji Hyun, former Chair of the Emergency Response Committee of the Democratic Party of Korea; Lee Kwang Hee, CEO of Ondap and former Youth Vice Chair of the 2nd Policy Coordination Committee of the People Power Party; Oh Se Je, Senior Researcher at the Sogang Institute of Political Studies; Park Hyeonseok, Head of the Governance Group at the National Assembly Futures Institute; Lee Jung Jin, Head of the Politics and Parliamentary Affairs Team at the National Assembly Research Service; Park Hye Min, CEO of New Ways (a youth political development agency); and a member of the Youth Future Committee at the National Assembly Futures Institute. The discussion focused on “The Current State of Youth Politics and Improvement Measures.” The panel highlighted diverse perspectives on youth political participation and engaged in in-depth discussions on the importance of youth politics. Additionally, they identified key issues in youth political engagement and explored innovative solutions distinct from traditional approaches. The subsequent "Dialogue with Youth" session featured a Q&A segment with the audience. The forum was livestreamed on the National Assembly Broadcasting YouTube channel, and the materials are available on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s website.

2024.11.22

News Release

Hosts the 2nd Happiness Forum: "Advancing Toward a Happy Nation – Issues and Policy Directions"
National Assembly Futures Institute Hosts the 2nd Happiness Forum: "Advancing Toward a Happy Nation – Issues and Policy Directions" Exploring research and studies for building a happy nation and proposing policy directions On November 25 at 9:30 a.m., the National Assembly Futures Institute, in collaboration with the National Happiness Policy Forum (a National Assembly research group), the offices of Members of the National Assembly Yoon Ho Jung and Kim Sun Min, the Gross National Happiness Forum, and the Korea Social Science Data Archive at Seoul National University, hosted a seminar titled “Advancing Toward a Happy Nation: Issues and Policy Directions” in the 2nd Seminar Room of the National Assembly Members’ Office Building. The first part of the event included an opening ceremony and an award presentation. It began with an opening address by Park Myungkwang, Chair of the National Assembly Futures Institute, followed by congratulatory remarks from Members of the National Assembly Yoon Ho Jung of the Democratic Party of Korea, Ahn Sang Hoon of the People Power Party, and Kim Sun Min of the Rebuilding Korea Party. The award ceremony that followed recognized the winners of the Happiness Research Paper Competition. The second part of the seminar featured three presentations. Heo Jongho, Director of the Quality of Life Data Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute, presented on “The State of Happiness and Quality of Life in Korea: Analysis of the 2024 National Future Perception and Values Survey Results.” He discussed the background and findings of the 2024 survey. Next, Professor Shin In Cheol of the University of Seoul delivered a presentation titled “Leave No One Behind: Socially Disadvantaged Groups and Happiness,” exploring prior research on happiness inequality and examining the relationship between social quality and happiness. Lastly, Jung Hae Sik, President of the Korea Development Institute for Self-Sufficiency and Welfare, gave a presentation on “Policy Directions for a Happy Nation,” exploring methods for designing policies aimed at enhancing national happiness. During the subsequent discussion session, Professor Han Joon of Yonsei University served as the moderator. The panelists were Professor Kim Ji Won of Hankyong National University, Lee Jae Kyung, Director of the Korea Gross National Happiness Policy Research Institute, Lee Man Woo, Senior Officer for Social and Cultural Affairs at the National Assembly Research Service, and Lee Hee Gil, Head of the Andong Office at the Dongbuk Regional Statistics Office. The panel engaged in discussions on the presentations.

2024.11.22

News Release

CoHost Seminar on “The Future of the International Order and Korea-China Relations After the U.S. Presidential Election”
National Assembly Futures Institute and Korean-Chinese Parliamentarians' Union Co-Host International Seminar on “The Future of the International Order and Korea-China Relations After the U.S. Presidential Election” The National Assembly Futures Institute and the Korean-Chinese Parliamentarians' Union, with Kim Tae Nyeon of the Democratic Party of Korea serving as Chair and Kim Sung Won of the People Power Party as Senior Vice Chair, co-hosted an international seminar on November 22 (Friday) in the Conference Room of the Erum Center, under the theme “The Future of the International Order and Korea-China Relations After the U.S. Presidential Election.” This seminar brought together scholars and experts from Korea and China to forecast changes in the international order following the U.S. presidential election and to share and discuss the strategies and perspectives of both countries. Organized into multiple sessions, the seminar addressed topics such as U.S.-China relations, the global economic order, the Northeast Asian order, the Korean Peninsula issue, and the future of Korea-China relations after the U.S. presidential election. Through presentations and discussions by experts from both countries, the event aimed to enhance mutual understanding and explore directions for cooperation. Kim Tae Nyeon, Chair of the Korean-Chinese Parliamentarians' Union, emphasized in his congratulatory remarks that “Korea-China relations are like the two wheels of a cart, mutually complementary.” He expressed his hope that “Through this seminar, experts from both countries will engage in discussions on U.S.-China relations, the global economic order, the Northeast Asian order, and the future of the Korean Peninsula amidst the changing international dynamics following the U.S. presidential election, and share practical cooperation measures and wisdom together.” Cha Jungmi, Director of the International Strategy Research Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute, stated that “The direction of U.S.-China relations following the U.S. presidential election is a key factor influencing the future of the international order and South Korea’s diplomacy.” She emphasized that “Understanding China’s perceptions and strategies regarding the post-election order and fostering mutual communication are not only critical for forecasting the international order and establishing South Korea’s diplomatic strategies but also for exploring the path forward in developing Korea-China relations.” In the first session of the seminar, Professor Li Nan from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences presented on “The Prospects for U.S.-China Relations and China’s Strategy After the U.S. Presidential Election,” while Professor Zhang Huizhi from Jilin University gave a presentation on “The Global Economic Order and China’s Economic Security Strategy After the U.S. Presidential Election.” The panel discussion featured Cho Eun Gyo, Research Fellow at the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade; Baek Seo In, Professor at Hanyang University; and Park Sung Jun, Assistant Research Fellow at the National Assembly Futures Institute, who discussed future challenges and opportunities and proposed measures for Korea-China cooperation. In the second session, Professor Wang Zhizhi from Wuhan University delivered a presentation on “The U.S. Presidential Election and the Northeast Asian Order,” Professor Bi Yingda from Shandong University presented on “The U.S. Presidential Election, the Landscape on the Korean Peninsula, and China’s Policy Toward North Korea,” and Professor Qian Yong from Zhejiang University discussed “The U.S. Presidential Election and Korea-China Relations.” The panel discussion was held with Heo Jae Chul, Research Fellow at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, and Lee Young Hak, Research Fellow at the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, who shared their outlook on the dynamics in Northeast Asia and on the Korean Peninsula, and proposed measures for Korea-China cooperation. The National Assembly Futures Institute hosted an international seminar in October in collaboration with Princeton University on the future of the international order after the U.S. presidential election. In November, it held an international seminar with Chinese scholars on Korea-China relations following the U.S. presidential election, and in December, another seminar with Japanese scholars on Korea-Japan relations after the election. Through this series of global dialogues, the Institute aimed to explore projections for the future international order and identify directions for mid- to long-term diplomatic strategies.

2024.11.21

News Release

International Semina “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election”
National Assembly Futures Institute, Princeton University, National Assembly Global Diplomacy and Security Forum, and Advanced Diplomacy Forum Host International Seminar on “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election” On Tuesday, October 15, the National Assembly Futures Institute, in collaboration with Princeton University’s Niehaus Center, the National Assembly Global Diplomacy and Security Forum (chaired by Yoon Jae Ok), and the Bipartisan Forum for Advanced Diplomacy (chaired by Wi Sung Rak), hosted an international seminar titled “The Future of the International Order and the Global Economy After the U.S. Presidential Election” in the 2nd Seminar Room of the National Assembly Members’ Office Building. This seminar, organized by Princeton University’s Niehaus Center, invited 22 prominent American political scientists and international political economists visiting Korea to discuss the anticipated results of the U.S. presidential election and its potential impact on the international order and the global economy. The event provided a platform for dialogue between the American scholars and Korean members of the National Assembly, academics, and experts. Cha Jungmi, Director of the International Strategy Research Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute, remarked, “With only 20 days left until the U.S. presidential election, the race is becoming increasingly unpredictable. In this heightened state of uncertainty, we have invited American political scientists well-versed in elections and the international political economy to forecast the election results and engage in a multifaceted discussion on their economic, political, and diplomatic-security implications. This event serves as a platform to prepare for the next global order.” In his welcoming remarks, Member of the National Assembly Yoon Jae Ok stated, “The crisis of the liberal international order faces complex challenges in various aspects, including politics, economy, environment, technology, leadership, and community,” and emphasized the importance of communication and cooperation. The first session focused on forecasting the results of the U.S. presidential election and congressional elections for the Senate and House of Representatives, as well as discussing the implications for U.S. politics, foreign policy direction, and the international order after the election. Moderated by Professor Jeon Jae Sung of Seoul National University, the session featured presentations by Professor Frances Lee of Princeton University and Professor Seo Jung Kun of Kyung Hee University. A panel discussion followed, with participation from Member of the National Assembly Choi Hyung Doo, Professor Nolan McCarty and Professor Yoo Hye Young of Princeton University, and Park Hyeonseok, Head of the Governance Group at the National Assembly Futures Institute. Professor Frances Lee, in her presentation, stated, “There has not been a time since 2000 when presidential, Senate, and House elections have been so fiercely contested simultaneously,” predicting that the outcomes would be decided by extremely narrow margins. She analyzed that such close election results could lead to various risks, including the potential for legal disputes, continued partisan gridlock and weakened bipartisan cooperation—what she described as the “Era of Insecure Majorities”—as well as the emergence of a “politically vulnerable president” with a narrow geographic support base. Professor Seo Jung Kun predicted that if Trump is re-elected, U.S. foreign policy is likely to center around unilateralism and non-interventionism. He analyzed the legislative impacts of policies such as the IRA and emphasized that considering the future of U.S. politics and the South Korean economy, the U.S. Congress could play a critical role in shaping the international order and U.S.-Korea relations. The second session focused on forecasting the impacts on the trade order. Moderated by Yoo Myung Hee, former Minister for Trade, the session featured presentations by Professor Leo Baccini of McGill University and Professor Lee Seung Joo of Chung-Ang University. A panel discussion followed with Helen Milner, Director of the Niehaus Center at Princeton University; Professor Stephanie Rickard of the London School of Economics; Jung Ki Chang, Head of the International Trade Team at Lee & Ko; and Cho Sung Dae, Head of the Trade Research Division at the Korea International Trade Association. Professor Leo Baccini, in his presentation, noted that “Economic uncertainty has deepened due to the slowdown in trade cooperation over the past 20 years, stagnation in trade liberalization over the past decade, the recent rise in protectionism, and the emergence of populism.” He stated that “A second Trump administration would pose challenges to global trade governance, such as implementing universal tariffs of at least 10%.” He also projected that “While Harris’s trade policy remains unclear, it is likely to follow the trajectory of the Biden administration, refraining from signing new free trade agreements, imposing security-related trade regulations on China, promoting industrial subsidies aimed at protecting labor rights and environmental standards, and introducing import measures to safeguard industries such as steel and green energy.” Professor Lee Seung Joo remarked in his presentation that “The world is now in an era of “slowbalization,” characterized by the slow pace of globalization.” He emphasized that “The outcome of the U.S. presidential election will determine whether we face Trade War 2.0 or the continuation of de-risking strategies.” The third session focused on forecasting changes in economic security and de-risking strategies. Moderated by Kim Hyun Wook, President of the Sejong Institute, the session featured presentations by Professor Kenneth Scheve of Yale University and Professor Park Jong Hee of Seoul National University. The panel discussion consisted of Professor Dustin Tingley of Harvard University, Professor Edward Mansfield of the University of Pennsylvania, Professor Bae Young Ja of Konkuk University, and Cha Jungmi, Director of the International Strategy Research Center at the National Assembly Futures Institute. Professor Kenneth Scheve, in his presentation, stated that “A second Trump administration would likely focus on promoting reshoring through tariffs and investment restrictions, offering tax benefits to specific sectors such as semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and defense, and prioritizing oil, gas, and coal production over the IRA and green technology policies.” He added that “A Harris administration would emphasize strengthening supply chain resilience in areas such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, pharmaceuticals, and green technologies. It would also aim to reduce reliance on China, diversify trade by enhancing cooperation with allies, and expand the national role in supporting the domestic economy.” He also raised the question, “Are the differences between the policies of the Harris and Trump administrations being exaggerated?” He pointed out that the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 highlighted that reshoring alone is costly, suggesting that deeper partnerships with allies, including South Korea, would be necessary to establish diversified supply chains, outlining a similar strategic approach. Professor Park Jong Hee of Seoul National University emphasized that “An inward-looking approach to economic security by the United States and its allies is insufficient to address China’s global challenges and achieve domestic goals.” He stressed the importance of “revitalizing the rules-based multilateral trade system as a critical factor for economic growth and international stability” and highlighted the need to reinvigorate the WTO. He also proposed tasks such as engaging the Global South leveraging AI. This international seminar was livestreamed on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s YouTube channel, and presentation materials are available in the announcements section of the Institute’s website.

2024.10.14

News Release

National Assembly Futures Institute Co-Hosts Seminar: "Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition"
National Assembly Futures Institute Co-Hosts Seminar: "Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition" Discussion on Labor Politics and Strategic Approaches to China in Europe and Korea On September 20 at 1:20 p.m., the National Assembly Futures Institute co-hosted a seminar titled “Global Crisis and the Era of Transition, Europe and Korea” in the 8th and 9th Conference Rooms of the National Assembly Members' Office Building. The event was jointly organized with the offices of Members of the National Assembly Kim Tae Sun and Kim Wi Sang, the Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies, the Institute of EU Studies and Humanities and Social Sciences Institute of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, and EURAXESS Korea. The seminar featured discussions on the strategic approach of the EU to China, the Brussels Effect, and labor politics in Korea. At the opening ceremony, welcoming remarks were delivered by Kim Tae Sun, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, and Kim Wi Sang, a member of the People Power Party. Congratulatory messages followed from Yoon Sung Won, President of the Korean Association of European Studies; Kim Myeon Hoe, Director of the Humanities and Social Sciences Institute at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies; and Tomasz Wierzbowski, Head of EURAXESS Korea. In the subsequent seminar, the Institute of EU Studies and the Humanities and Social Sciences Institute of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies hosted a panel discussion on the theme “The Brussels Effect and the Global Expansion of EU Regulations.” The Korean Association of European Studies held a panel discussion on “The EU and Major European Countries’ Strategic Approaches to China.” Finally, the National Assembly Futures Institute conducted a panel discussion on the theme “Korean Labor Politics: Where Are We Heading?” The seminar booklet for “Europe and Korea in an Era of Global Crisis and Transition” is available on the National Assembly Futures Institute’s website.

2024.09.19

Research Report

(24-02 Series Report) A Meta-Evaluation Study on Mid- to Long-Term Plans in the Social Policy Sector
P.I : Lee, Chae-jeong

The government’s mid- to long-term plans, developed every 5–10 years, serve as critical legal frameworks to ensure policy consistency and long-term strategic direction. While these plans outline policy visions, they are non-binding and do not impose direct obligations or rights on citizens. However, their rapid growth in number—from 534 in 2019 to 679 in 2022— has exposed challenges such as weak interconnectivity and coherence among plans, redundancies, inefficiencies, and unclear hierarchies between upper- and lower-level plans. Additionally, frequent policy changes and vague funding strategies have further diminished the effectiveness of these plans. This study evaluates the structure and interconnectivity of mid- to long-term plans in the social policy sector, assessing their impact across key policy areas in a bid to propose actionable improvement strategies. This study employed network centrality and community detection analyses on 68 mid- to long-term plans across social policy areas, including healthcare, education, housing, employment, and social security. Key communities were identified around employment, healthcare, social security, population, and housing plans. High-centrality plans, such as the Basic Employment Policy Plan and the Comprehensive National Health Promotion Plan, were found to function as hubs within the network. However, the network as a whole exhibited low cohesion and significant fragmentation, underscoring the need for efficiency improvements. Meta-evaluations across major social policy areas provided the following critical insights: Regional Disparities and Depopulation: Region-specific policies and enhancements to living infrastructure are essential for addressing these issues. Health Inequalities: Expanding public healthcare institutions and leveraging digital healthcare solutions are critical for reducing disparities. Universal Policies for Vulnerable Groups: While universal policies for older adults and young children have shown some success in mitigating inequality, additional income-based support is required to address disparities within these groups. Work-Life Balance: Improving the universality and effectiveness of parental leave systems, alongside increasing male participation in parental leave, is crucial for achieving better work-life integration. To address the redundancies and fragmented linkages among mid- to long-term government plans, the establishment of a dedicated coordinating body is recommended. This body should ensure policy consistency by minimizing political interference. Furthermore, the National Assembly must strengthen the legal framework to improve the connectivity and systematic organization of these plans. Continuous monitoring of policy impacts and reinforcement of feedback mechanisms are essential for achieving sustained improvements. These institutional reforms are expected to enhance policy efficiency, reduce social inequality, and contribute to sustainable development. This study offers valuable insights to optimize mid- to long-term planning in the social policy sector.

2024-12-30
(24-17 Research Report) 2024 National Future Perception and Values Survey - Basic Analysis Report
P.I : Lee, Chae-jeong

Despite its strong economic standing, Korea continues to face low levels of life satisfaction and happiness among its citizens, compounded by various social challenges. This highlights the need for a systematic approach to measuring quality of life and understanding public perceptions of societal changes to inform effective policy solutions. This study aimed to evaluate overall life satisfaction and future expectations among Koreans aged 15 and older through in-person household surveys conducted in 2024. Additionally, it analyzed perceptions of major societal changes, including demographic shifts, technological advancements, and environmental issues, to generate actionable policy insights. The study revealed an average life satisfaction score of 6.81 out of 10, with a relatively optimistic future expectation score of 7.02 for life five years from now. Higher satisfaction levels were observed among individuals with higher education, higher income, and those who were married. While respondents expressed high satisfaction with health, interpersonal relationships, and a sense of safety, their satisfaction with future stability was notably lower. Positive perceptions were also evident in areas such as life meaning, sense of achievement, and freedom in life decisions. In terms of social values, respondents strongly endorsed the importance of striving for better outcomes and demonstrated high trust in technological advancements. However, there was widespread concern about the negative impact that low birth rates and population aging will have on quality of life. A significant sense of responsibility for addressing climate change was also noted. Leisure activity preferences showed a strong inclination toward watching video content, with individuals tending to spend weekdays alone and weekends with family. The average length of residence was 35 years at the metropolitan level and 22.8 years at the provincial level, with moderate intent to remain in the respondents’ current residential areas. Targeted policies and in-depth research are essential for supporting vulnerable groups― such as the elderly, individuals with lower education levels, and low-income populations― who reported lower life satisfaction. Enhancing quality of life should be prioritized through shifts in social values and public perceptions. Systematic policy responses to demographic and technological changes are equally important, as are initiatives to increase awareness and encourage actionable responses to climate change. A comprehensive approach is necessary to continuously collect and analyze the data necessary for monitoring citizens' quality of life and perceptions of societal changes. These insights should be integrated into policy planning and decision-making to ensure relevance and effectiveness. This study provides a critical foundation for improving the quality of life for citizens and proactively addressing future societal challenges.

2024-12-30
(24-16 Research Report) Dialogues on the Future with Citizens: A Study on Emerging Citizens' Perceptions of the Future
P.I : Park, Seongwon

As societies face increasing complexity and rapid transformation, the "Emerging Citizens" concept provides a critical lens to understand and address future societal shifts. Emerging Citizens are defined as individuals or groups characterized by one or more of their attributes such as regionality, minority status, intersectionality, or emergent behaviors. These citizens are not merely vulnerable or marginalized but possess the potential to drive societal transitions through their unique perspectives and actions. This report explores the role and significance of Emerging Citizens in envisioning and shaping future societies. It expands upon traditional research approaches by integrating "preferred futures" with "avoided futures," thereby identifying potential social risks and actionable responses. By engaging with diverse case studies―including regional residents, medical AI users, multicultural international students, women peace activists, and an SF writer with disabilities―the report highlights how Emerging Citizens can illuminate structural inequities and propose innovative solutions. The key findings underscore the importance of integrating the voices of Emerging Citizens into policymaking to foster inclusivity and equity. For example: • Regional engagement: Dialogues with citizens from Incheon reveal urgent concerns such as economic stagnation, insufficient healthcare infrastructure, and environmental challenges. Solutions proposed by participants ranged from resource conservation to technological innovation. • Intersectional advocacy: Women peace activists and their dual focus on gender equality and peacebuilding demonstrate how intersectional approaches can redefine democratic and inclusive policy frameworks. • Technological transformation: The adoption of AI in healthcare reshapes professional roles and presents ethical and regulatory challenges, highlighting the need for collaborative policymaking. • Cultural integration: Multicultural students, particularly international students in regional areas, highlight the potential for economic and cultural revitalization but face linguistic and systemic barriers that demand targeted support. • Creative perspectives: The work of an SF writer with disabilities exemplifies how creative approaches can redefine societal norms and envision inclusive futures through technology and storytelling. This report concludes by emphasizing that Emerging Citizens are not merely subjects of change but active agents capable of sparking societal transformation. Their lived experiences and emergent issues serve as vital signals for detecting future risks and designing adaptive, multidimensional policies. Addressing the challenges they raise requires innovative policy frameworks, legislative support, and enhanced social solidarity to create a fairer and more sustainable society. Through this analysis, the report aims to inspire policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders to recognize and amplify the voices of Emerging Citizens, ensuring their inclusion in shaping the trajectories of future societies.

2024-12-30
(24-15 Research Report) The Future Society Report 2024: Focusing on an Indicator System for the Future Society Response
P.I : Min, Bogyeong

This study aims to support rational decision-making based on scientific and objective data in an era of increasing uncertainty and complexity across various sectors, including politics, economy, society, and science and technology. Emphasizing the importance of long-term future projections and policy alternatives to address complex societal challenges, the study focuses on establishing an indicator system to respond to future societal changes. Specifically, it revisits the Future Society Response Indicators(FSRIs) established in 2020 to develop a more relevant framework reflecting the evolving environment. The research involved reviewing the latest literature, examining research trends, and consulting experts to propose a revised indicator system. While retaining the existing framework of a Smart Growth Society, a Sustainable and Secure Society, and a Collaborative Society Respecting Diversity, the study refined indicators by adding, removing, or modifying them to align with contemporary challenges. Key updates include the addition of artificial intelligence (AI) utilization metrics, indicators addressing social changes related to birth rates, restructuring of aging-related metrics, enhancements for climate crisis response indicators, and the introduction of metrics for mitigating social conflict and personalized learning. For example, a new AI Global Index was added to address digital transformation, and metrics such as pension replacement rates were included to tackle aging issues. The analysis revealed distinct trends within the framework. In the Smart Growth Society, technological quantitative indicators performed well, but digital capability utilization remained weak. For the Sustainable and Secure Society, progress was observed in indicators related to childcare leave and domestic labor sharing to address low birth rates, but economic burdens like housing and private education costs continued to hinder marriage and childbirth. On climate crisis and carbon neutrality, renewable energy utilization increased but remained at the lowest levels among OECD countries, with natural disaster frequencies rising due to climate change. In the Collaborative Society Respecting Diversity, the gender wage gap showed a declining trend but remained significant. Career education satisfaction among high school students declined, highlighting the need for improvements in learner-centered, customized education systems. Indicators related to democracy, such as the Corruption Perception Index and the World Governance Index, improved, while the World Peace Index rose. However, the North-South Unification Index declined. The AHP survey results indicated that academic and policy advisory groups prioritized the Sustainable and Secure Society. Experts emphasized indicators related to inequality and social challenges, whereas policy advisors focused on specific issues. These perspectives helped identify key priorities and critical indicators for the future. In conclusion, this study provides an evidence-based analysis to present improvement strategies to realize a desirable future society for Korea. It highlights the need for strategies to address low-performing international metrics and stresses the importance of data-driven decision-making in navigating multifaceted changes, including climate crises, declining birth rates, aging, and a digital transformation.

2024-12-30
(24-14 Research Report) Envisioning Normative Futures for Long-Term Peace on the Korean Peninsula: A Scenario-Based Approach Using Causal Loop Diagrams
P.I : Kim, Tae-kyung

□ Purpose and Distinction of the Study The primary objective of this study is to explore normative futures for long-term peace on the Korean Peninsula. Multiple visions of normative futures are presented through causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to provide a mental model for understanding the Korean Peninsula's peace system, its sustainability, and potential transformations. Four scenarios of normative futures are developed to illustrate the multiplicity of possible peace pathways. These scenarios aim to stimulate productive debates and social dialogues among the public and the National Assembly on the drivers and feedback loops that define each future. As a preliminary effort, the results —derived from expert dialogues—will serve as foundational data for broader public discussions and bipartisan dialogues in subsequent research. □ Methodology The research adopts a backcasting approach, commonly used in transition studies such as climate change research, to strategically envision pathways to normative futures. Causal loop diagrams are utilized to visualize systemic interactions and to conceptualize peace as a dynamic equilibrium influenced by multiple feedback loops. The study emphasizes a bottom-up perspective, highlighting the roles of civil society and the National Assembly in envisioning and strategizing for these futures. Expert dialogues have been prioritized in this phase due to budget and time constraints, but future iterations will expand to include wider civic participation. □ Definition of Peace The study embraces a comprehensive view of peace that spans peace-keeping, peace-making, and peace-building, recognizing it as a multidimensional and multilevel concept. Rather than focusing solely on an ideal state of peace, it considers peace as the absence of full-scale war and situates it within a spectrum ranging from “negative peace”(security-centric approaches) to “positive peace” (institutional and social democratization). This broad definition serves as a foundational premise for fostering bipartisan and inclusive discussions about the Korean Peninsula's future. □ Key Findings: Four Normative Futures for Korean Peninsula Peace ∙ Adversarial Peace: A status quo scenario marked by heightened tensions due to strategic competition among major powers, reinforced adversarial neglect between North and South Korea, and growing political polarization in South Korea. ∙ Balance of Terror: A state of extreme “negative peace” based on nuclear deterrence and arms control, underpinned by a societal consensus on deterrence as a rational choice. ∙ Functional Peace: A scenario of deepening functional integration through economic and cooperative exchanges between the Koreas, reducing tensions via mutual interdependence. ∙ Institutional Peace: A future characterized by institutionalized coexistence and integration, supported by a denuclearization-peace regime, cooperative political culture, and socio-economic democratization. ∙ Each scenario is visualized through CLDs, highlighting interactions among drivers, feedback loops, and systemic dynamics. Emerging issues identified in expert workshops are incorporated into the scenarios to provide foresight into potential disruptions and transformations. □ Role of the National Assembly The study outlines strategic and institutional roles for the National Assembly in each scenario: ∙ Adversarial Peace: Prevent full-scale conflict by maintaining minimal institutional channels for communication and managing risks of escalation. ∙ Balance of Terror: Pass legislation for arms control and deterrence stabilization. ∙ Functional Peace: Build societal consensus for functional integration and reform constitutional and legal frameworks to support long-term cooperation. ∙ Institutional Peace: Enact laws to institutionalize coexistence and explore governance models such as federation or confederation. □ Short-Term Policy Recommendations Given the current trajectory toward adversarial peace or balance of terror, the study recommends an immediate focus on preventing accidental conflicts and misjudgments. It proposes the Speaker of the National Assembly lead a multi-layered mediation initiative, leveraging the Assembly's bipartisan nature to promote peace diplomacy.

2024-12-30
(24-13 Research Report) Reshaping of the Global Supply Chain and International Trade Order
P.I : Park, Sung Jun

It has been approximately six years since the U.S.-China technological competition began to intensify. It is now quite clear that the rules-based global trade system is in decline, and the second Trump administration is expected to further destabilize the system. This report aims to offer a more objective assessment of the ongoing changes in the global supply chain, predict future trends, and discuss policy implications. The report begins by analyzing the factors driving shifts in U.S. trade policy. First, “China Shock”, which represents the disruption caused by globalization, is examined along with its economic and political implications. Second, the changes in the international order following the end of the Cold War is analyzed. Next, the report quantitatively evaluates the shifts in the global supply chain caused by the U.S.-China trade war using bilateral trade data and Inter-Country Input-Output(ICIO) tables. It also examines technological advancements in key sub-sectors of semiconductors and secondary batteries, which are closely tied to geopolitical risks, using patent data. The report finds that while the share of U.S. imports from China has decreased, the reliance of major U.S. trading partners on Chinese supply chains has increased. Technological advancements that help mitigate geopolitical risks were identified in sectors like semiconductors(chiplets and advanced packaging) and secondary batteries (materials for cathodes and anodes). Finally, the report investigates potential triggers for changes in the global trade order and inter-country conflicts, such as the re-election of President Trump and China’s overcapacity issue. The key policy recommendations of the report are as follows: prepare for upcoming trade negotiations with President Trump, further diversify supply chains, strengthen policy coordination with major economies, and support technological development to reduce geopolitical risks.

2024-12-30
previous slide button
slide_pause
next slide button

Brief Report

previous slide button
slide_pause
next slide button

scroll-down